Why is the coinsurance clause significant in property insurance?

Prepare for the CUNA Insurance Producer Test with detailed questions and comprehensive exams. Boost your confidence and get exam-ready with interactive study aids!

The significance of the coinsurance clause in property insurance lies in its effect on the amount of compensation for claims. This clause requires the policyholder to maintain insurance coverage that is a certain percentage of the property's total value, typically 80%, 90%, or 100%. If the insured fails to carry the required amount of insurance and then files a claim, the coinsurance clause will reduce the payout based on the ratio of the actual coverage to the required coverage.

For example, if a property is valued at $100,000 and the policyholder only insured it for $70,000, they would not meet the coinsurance requirement of 80%. In the event of a covered loss, compensation would be calculated accordingly, which may result in the insured receiving a lower payout than expected. This is designed to encourage policyholders to insure their properties closer to their actual value, thus spreading the risk more accurately among insurers.

The other options present various scenarios that don't capture the essential purpose of the coinsurance clause. It does not eliminate the need for deductibles, guarantee coverage regardless of value, or inherently increase premiums dramatically, which makes option B the correct and most relevant choice in the context of property insurance and claims processing.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy